It generated a disappointing .4 billion kWh thus producing at an average rate of 46 MW the first year. By way of comparison, another nonpolluting source of electricity, nuclear power plant, the Millstone reactor No. There are good reasons for distinguishing capacity from energy (MW v MWh) especially when it comes to reliably maintaining the grid on peak demand hours (a function of capacity not energy.) Ivanpah is the largest solar thermal energy facility in the world with 392 MW of capacity -- meaning it can produce enough renewable electricity to power nearly 100,000 homes.” Some had great ideas that were just ahead of their time. The project is currently the largest solar thermal power plant in the world. Ivanpah Fact Sheet : View Larger Map: Project Overview. Two hundred carbon-fiber cylinders, each weighing 2,500 lb. The sea is a harsh environment for mechanical systems. [1]. California’s Ivanpah, the world’s biggest power-tower project with a cost of $2.2 billion, has 377 megawatts of capacity. Before it's here, it's on the Bloomberg Terminal. This practice makes performance and efficiency comparisons cumbersome, and is therefore not pursued, allowing misinformation to flourish. Stan, Tom: 2 in Connecticut, operating at 880 MW since 1975, cost 0.5 $/W, making Ivanpah, Following that logic, this latest 392 MW (name-plate) giant was built on 13 km, The 2200 million dollars per 120 million watts represents an 18 dollars per watt ($/W) investment. New Solar + Battery Price Crushes Fossil Fuels, Buries Nuclear Jeff McMahon Senior Contributor Jul 1, 2019, 12:03am. In 2016 the company sold its wind operations and shifted its focus to solar. Blokart North American Championships 2019, Ivanpah Dry Lake in Mojave Desert, CA. It is built near the existing roads and transmission lines, next to a natural gas power plant. And there are other items to consider with respect to the net output and CO2. But Beacon was ahead of its time: Existing regulations didn’t make it possible for the company to charge different rates to provide a speedier alternative. SolarReserve Inc., which built the only other U.S. facility in Nevada, is developing projects in other parts of the world but this year canceled plans for Australia’s first power tower when it couldn’t line up financing. It was a popular idea a decade ago as oil prices were well above $100 a barrel, but it became a tougher sell when oil got cheaper. Ivanpah is a $2.2 billion dollar failure covering 5 square miles of earth. Construction on a project in the Atacama Desert of northern Chile was resumed last year, two years after former co-owner Abengoa SA put it on hold because of financial issues. Here’s a sample of technologies that attracted considerable brainpower and resources, only to have us find that the world wasn’t ready for them yet. I was a supervisory biologist for the agency on which most of these projects reside, but because I didn’t support the “team” who had the expectation that I direct by resource employees to lie about the “overwhelming benefits” of commercial-scale renewable projects while the fragile desert resources were being permanently obliterated, I was encouraged into early retirement. Los Angeles Power and Water officials have struck a deal on the largest and cheapest solar + battery-storage project in the world, at prices that leave fossil fuels in the dust and may relegate nuclear power to the dustbin. Tensions between solar generators and NPCA environmentalists have grown since former Secretary of the Interior Sally Jewell, based on the supposed success of Ivanpah, announced the approval of the 350 megawatt Midland Solar Energy Project in Nevada, and the 100 megawatt Quartzsite Solar Energy Project in Arizona. Ivanpah burns natural gas all night as well. And then there are the folks who were … less successful. Assuming the same salaries, benefits, and the electricity selling price, the operating expense is 15, Note that the above two outlays are 35 and 15, As for the occupied land comparison, those 120 MW spread over 13 km, relatively small amount of electricity. The newest and largest solar power plant in Mojave Desert has completed its second year of operation. The company offered turbines small enough to be installed on homes, with curved blades that spun around a vertical axis. I need a better reason. Credit... Ethan Miller/Getty Images. Michael Lynch Still, the idea of harnessing the kinetic energy of waves, tides, or currents to generate power has fueled several startups. In the first two years the plant delivered only 1/3rd of the assumed 100 percent. The costs of single-circuit alternating current transmission lines for 1989: for a 230 kilovolt line - $150,000 to 375,000 per mile, for a 500 kV line - $400,000 to 800,000 per mile. That just can’t compete with photovoltaic solar. U.K.-based Tidal Lagoon Power Ltd. set out to build turbines on a barrage across Swansea Bay, in South Wales, that would draw power from the motion of the tides. The 2200 million dollars per 120 million watts represents an 18 dollars per watt ($/W) investment. (AP photo)(CNSNews.com) – Despite receiving an estimated $39 billion in annual government subsidies over the past five years, the solar energy industry accounted for just one half of one … Ivanpah is the largest solar thermal energy facility in the world with 392 MW of capacity -- meaning it can produce enough renewable electricity to power nearly 100,000 homes.” Ivanpah, which accounts for nearly 30 percent of all solar thermal energy currently operational in the US, is the largest solar project of its kind in the world. This type of power plant generates electricity by concentrating sun rays on a “boiler” making high pressure, high temperature steam that drives a turbine generator. Note: You might be curious to know how efficient the Ivanpah plant is in utilizing solar insolation (irradiation). Clearway provides operations, maintenance, and asset management services for 4.3 GW of operating assets. In 2011 the $1 billion project was to be the biggest solar plant of its kind, and it looked like the future of renewable power. In 2016 the company changed its name to TerraVia Holdings Inc., and a year later it filed for bankruptcy. The Ivanpah Solar Electric Generating System, the largest solar power plant of its kind in the world, covers 5 square miles in the Mojave Desert near the California-Nevada border. Tom Tanton, A project of the institute for energy research, “The 2200 million dollars per 120 million watts represents an 18 dollars per watt ($/W) investment. Its assets were acquired by a private equity fund. To adjust for surges in supply or demand, they would ramp generation up or down. Urban Green Energy Inc. tried that. We must be either very rich or very ignorant to be building power sources of the type that produce power we cannot afford. Potential Output - Master Resource, Energy–renewable sources and thermodynamics. It’s one of those solar efforts where the economy of scale was supposed to produce effective […], […] [2] http://www.masterresource.org/ivanpah-solar-plant/ivanpah-solar-fail/ […], […] up to one tenth of the power output is drawn from those external energy sources. The predicted Capacity Factor of 31 percent indicates a 120 MW expected actual average output. It’s still pursuing the technology but is now seeking to power remote sites such as offshore oil rigs. Ivanpah uses power tower solar thermal technology to generate power by creating high-temperature steam to drive a conventional steam turbine. Solazyme Inc. engineered strains of algae that could be processed into fuels but eventually followed a similar path into chemicals. Tom: The local San Bernardino chapter changed its name and went on opposing the project. The best you can get is normally an estimation of these values, the real ones are protected. Rather than focusing on the poor performance of the Ivanpah, the following text and numbers show how the planned-for performance, capital and operational expenses and earnings compare with another power plant. [The] Ivanpah Project has helped advance technology in the industry, shown us new ways to secure financing, and is setting records and inspiring the industry," said Laura Dinnewell, Director of Solar Power Generation USA, the industry’s leading utility-scale solar power conference. Ivanpah in California is the world’s largest solar project. By way of comparison, another nonpolluting source of electricity, nuclear power plant, the Millstone reactor No. The already “bad” ratios are actually three times worse than those calculated here. By way of comparison, another nonpolluting source of electricity, nuclear power plant, the Millstone reactor No. What about rooftop wind power? The project will also help curb … These projects are all about power; but when the federal government, foreign corporations, and google all partner up and use your dollars to continue to build these, knowing that the cost-benefit doesn’t add up, the primary power goes to relieve us of our incomes and eventually our freedoms. The Failure of Solar Tower Thermal Energy Storage. And those two cents cover also taxes, debt-servicing, dividend payments, etc. It should be pointed out again, that these dreadfully unfavorable ratios apply to a plant delivering its planned-for output. Perhaps they will be available someday. Including renewable assets owned through our affiliate company, Clearway Energy, Inc., Clearway’s operating footprint of renewable energy projects totals 4.7 GW, including 3.2 GW of utility-scale wind, 1.2 GW of utility-scale solar, and over 300 MW of community and distributed solar. That just can’t compete with photovoltaic solar. California’s Ivanpah, the world’s biggest power-tower project with a cost of $2.2 billion, has 377 megawatts of capacity. In my view, if the plant is rated in W at 100 % capacity (utilization) factor, why is it rated in Wh at its actual CF? Concentrated solar power's failure to gain momentum in U.S. markets is a ... like the 110 MW Crescent Dunes Nevada project and the 394 MW Ivanpah California project, focus the … That is the number worked with below. By way of comparison, another nonpolluting source of electricity, nuclear power plant, the Millstone reactor No. They struggled to move from the lab to the factory. The footprint of Ivanpah may bb 6,000 acres, but the footprint of the electrical distribution infrastructure left over ten thousand acres devoid of life. CSP plants were promoted by the Department of Energy from the time DOE was created under President Carter. The Ivanpah Solar Electric Generating System is a concentrated solar thermal plant in the Mojave Desert.It is located at the base of Clark Mountain in California, across the state line from Primm, Nevada.The plant has a gross capacity of 392 megawatts (MW). The Ivanpah project proved to be a major battleground between the Sierra Club’s national office and its local chapter. And producing intermittent electricity causes CO2 generation elsewhere. For comparison again, the Millstone nuclear plant complex employs also about 1000, and its two reactors have been producing 1870 MW actual electrical output. Power grid operators like to keep electricity flowing at a smooth and steady pace. Following that logic, this latest 392 MW (name-plate) giant was built on 13 km2 of land in Mojave Desert at a cost of 2.2 billion dollars. These considerations should be included in the performance data for the net electricity delivered and CO, Concerning the DOE covering the invested billions, it was not just tax- and rate-payers who paid. It could also absorb excess energy from the grid. Beacon Power Corp. offered an alternative with its first commercial flywheel facility in 2011. Ivanpah was constructed by Bechtel and is operated by NRG Energy, one of the project's equity investors. They created systems that generated electricity, but not cheaply. You cant be the world's largest solar plant without burning natural gas. With production costs above $6 a gallon, it went bankrupt in 2014. Power generated by the three plants is enough to serve more than 140,000 homes during peak hours of the day. In the above paragraph, the former value is in “W” but the latter in “Wh.” The author wishes that such reporting use the same unit (W, as with the 392 MW and 46 MW above) or it states, as an example, “…. California’s Ivanpah, the world’s biggest power-tower project with a cost of $2.2 billion, has 377 megawatts of capacity. If the purpose of the CSPs is to cut CO2 emissions, that expectation is unrealistic. Biofuels produce fewer carbon emissions than oil because the plants suck up carbon as they grow and because it’s simpler to harvest plants than to drill for crude. The annals of green energy are filled with people who devised brilliant solutions to vexing problems, delivering more power for less money, making things cleaner, easier, and better. The vertical design was less efficient than standard turbines. Either way, it would be useful to show the math. Mirrors stand at the Ivanpah Solar Electric Generating System in the Mojave Desert near Primm, Nevada. Ivanpah failed thus requested to burn natural gas for 7 hours a day. In my view, if a power plant is rated in W at 100 % capacity (utilization) factor, why to rate it in Wh for its actual output? For remote solar plants like the Ivanpah project, built hundreds of miles from cities, the cost of upgrading and building new powerlines needs to be factored in. There are 96 CSP projects listed as operational worldwide in NREL Solar Paces. As for the occupied land comparison, those 120 MW spread over 13 km2 represents 9.2 W/m2. However, when taking into consideration the tens of thousands of acres of habitat for threatened and endangered species, and the direct impact to those species, we are led to think that there are other reasons the the government and social engineering tech companies subsidized these projects at taxpayer and consumer expense. Most solar cells contain polysilicon, which was still very expensive a decade ago. It was not apparent from the description whether the electric output was measured at the outlet from the generators (or transformers) or whether it was that output minus the electrical demand on the grid for electricity consumed from dusk to dawn in the plant, such as for lighting, air-conditioning, washing mirrors, water pumping, restarting machinery, etc. Some used a thin film of copper-indium-gallium-selenide (CIGS) on glass or plastic. Kior Inc., a once-promising startup backed by the venture capitalist Vinod Khosla, made fuel from wood chips. I do not get it aside from the fact that is how it is usually done. The plant also burns gasoline, diesel fuel and, prodigiously, natural gas. The beams of focused sunlight have also been known to fry birds midflight. By Ivan Penn. Polysilicon now costs about $9 a kilogram and dominates the solar industry. Donn Dears Mirrors are used to concentrate sunlight and create steam, which is then converted to electricity. The goal was to make a “drop-in compatible” fuel–one that could be used in a vehicle without modifying the engine. Smaller blades produce less power. Unlike the standard ethanol made from sugar in corn or sugar cane, this next generation would be produced from cellulose—the tough, stringy, indigestible fiber in plants or trees. UGE struggled with high costs and maintenance issues. Renmatix Inc. sought to convert wood into fuel but shifted to turning plants into specialty chemicals for the food and beauty industries. It comprises three separate solar units, one of 126MW and two units of 133MW each. Costs peaked at about $475 a kilogram in 2008, prompting the search for alternative designs. Biofuels remained stubbornly expensive. Solar and wind were promoted by the federal government as environmentally-friendly renewable sources of electricity. Ivanpah Solar Electric Generating System, Nipton: See 15 reviews, articles, and 14 photos of Ivanpah Solar Electric Generating System, ranked No.3 on Tripadvisor among 3 attractions in Nipton. In addition, the majority of the project’s supply chain was sourced in the United States, with components and services coming from at least 18 states. The $2.2 billion Ivanpah solar-thermal power plant in California and other high-tech solar projects aren't living up to promises their backers made about how much electricity they could generate. For more detailed information, download the Ivanpah Fact Sheet. 26 Only seven have net capacity of more than 100 MW. The ocean’s never-ending motion can be converted into electricity, but it’s not easy. Ivanpah is, however, a very successful “rapid raptor roaster”. ... the 377 MW Ivanpah Solar Electric Generating System and the 110 MW Crescent Dunes Solar Energy Project. (1,134kg), floated on magnetic fields and rotated as fast as 16,000 times a minute. Please name the “good” reason. Howdy, These figures are usually not public. Other companies are having more success with grid-scale marine power. That just can’t compete with photovoltaic solar. Published on May 3, 2018. These considerations should be included in the performance data for the net electricity delivered and CO2 saved. That just can’t compete with photovoltaic solar. Please name the “good” reason. I agree that renewable advocates usually take advantage and/or abuse the public’s mis-understanding of the two concepts, but we should focus on the disastrous less than 5% capacity value for wind and acknowledge the better-than-many capacity correlation of CSP and let the economics reveal themselves. Many became rich and famous in the process. I do not get it aside from the fact that how it is usually done. 2 in Connecticut, operating at 880 MW since 1975, cost 0.5 $/W, making Ivanpah 36 times more expensive (inflation excluded).”. The Ivanpah solar project as seen from the air in February 2014. The poster child was Solyndra LLC, which received $535 million in U.S. loan guarantees to develop glass tubes with CIGS films. Ocean Power pulled the plug in 2014, saying the project wasn’t “commercially viable,” and changed its strategy. The generator machinery is identical to that common in the fossil-fuel and nuclear plants, except that it has provisions for the every-day shut-down at dusk and restart with the rising sun. The construction, operating, maintaining and eventually dismantling this plant will at best match the amount of CO2 claimed to be saved in non-burning fossil-fuels for that relatively small amount of electricity. the plant has been producing 12 % of its name-plate power.”]. You’ve probably seen homes topped with solar panels. The magnitude of the discrepancy hints also at the reason why the “free” solar electricity is so expensive. The Ivanpah Solar Electric Generating System, the largest solar power plant of its kind in the world, covers 5 square miles in the Mojave Desert near the California-Nevada border. The ISEGS is spread over 3,471 acres of public land managed by the US Bureau of Land Management (BLM). The news is not good–and, in fact, very bad. With about 1000 employees receiving salary and benefits, the annual outlay for that alone is roughly $100 million. Usually called Concentrating Solar Power (CSP) plants, that term was coined to distinguish them from the Solar Thermal Power (STP) intended for direct heating such as in warming swimming pool water. Bechtel Group, which built Ivanpah for owners BrightSource Energy, NRG Energy, and Google, has said power towers aren’t competitive with other sources of electricity. As an example, a central station solar (concentrated) facility in the Mojave desert drew about 9% of its output from the grid and from burning natural gas, diesel fuel, propane, and […], […] According to a source on the internet, the construction cost of the Ivanpah facility was $2.2 billion dollars, which is $18 per watt of capacity. Building tortoise fences along roadways to keep them from the dangers of vehicles only serves to concentrate them along these areas to make them easy prey for coyotes and ravens that devastate younger tortoises. Learn more about our goals. It must have seemed like a good idea at the time. Ouch — only $6 million is left for other expenses, notably for natural gas whose burning produces 8 percent or more of the total output. Simec Atlantis Energy Ltd. operates the world’s first commercial tidal stream project, the 6MW MeyGen facility that went into service in Scotland in 2016. Even BrightSource, which developed the 377-megawatt Ivanpah Solar Electric Generating System complex in the Mojave Desert, is keeping a low profile in … The Ivanpah project proved to be a major battleground between the Sierra Club’s national office and its local chapter. The Solar Energy Technologies Office ... target is discussed in depth in the CSP 2030 Report released by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory in January 2019. In 2018 the two sites were acquired by a clean-energy developer. And they can be erected in any climate and in proximity to users. That would be cheaper and easier to source than food crops. Note that the above two outlays are 35 and 15 times higher, and that this huge discrepancy exists in an industry where a difference of a few percent means the difference between success and bankruptcy. Marlo Lewis Assuming the same salaries, benefits, and the electricity selling price, the operating expense is 15 times higher at Ivanpah. Ivanpah failed thus requested to burn natural gas for 7 hours a day. Tensions between solar generators and NPCA environmentalists have grown since former Secretary of the Interior Sally Jewell, based on the supposed success of Ivanpah, announced the approval of the 350 megawatt Midland Solar Energy Project in Nevada, and the 100 megawatt Quartzsite Solar Energy Project in Arizona. Google, among others, invested millions from its “green” fund, the same Google that abandoned its own PV solar facility and related R&D last year (2014). But battery systems have emerged to quickly deliver power to the grid or absorb it. Based on the above 120 MW output, the efficiency is then almost 27 percent. Alex Epstein Citigroup Inc. … The power tower might be the most dramatic energy idea: miles of garage-door-size mirrors focusing sunshine onto a boiler at the top of a tall tower to generate steam and produce electricity. “The 2200 million dollars per 120 million watts represents an 18 dollars per watt ($/W) investment. That was the promise of a wave of companies that tried to develop cheap, renewable alternatives to petroleum-based fuels. […]. They also occupy a fraction of the ground area CPS necessitates for equal output because the mirrors must be surrounded by open area on all sides to avoid shade when tilting to follow the sun. In contrast, ground based nuclear plants produce some 2000 W/m2 thus utilizing the land area some 200 times more effectively. The Ivanpah solar plant, in the Mojave Desert, was among the California power plants listed as operating below capacity last week. Selling the annual 3.8 EJ at the projected 0.028 $/MJ yields $106 million. The plant’s three 450ft high towers can produce 392MW of solar power at full capacity. In comparison, a similar capacity nuclear power plant had an inflation-adjusted construction cost that worked out to $0.50 per watt of capacity, making Ivanpah 36 times more expensive.” Ivanpah is not producing enough revenue from sale of electricity to pay its operating costs. In the end, they were simply the wrong thing at the wrong time. Ivanpah is a $2.2 billion dollar failure covering 5 square miles of earth. Amidst operational problems and a terminated power contract, a lawsuit by developer SolarReserve warns that a DOE takeover of the project could push it into bankruptcy. October 7, 2019 Christian Roselund “Relocating” the T&E species into surrounding areas stresses the habitats of the target areas to the point of diminishing the very species we are legally bound to protect. In 2011 the $1 billion project was to be the biggest solar plant of its kind, and it looked like the future of renewable power. Numerous other CIGS companies failed or were acquired in the following years. You cant be the world's largest Beacon ran out of money in 2011 while waiting for the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to revise its rules. PV plants by comparison utilize 220 W/m2 in that location and so would theoretically procure more power at the same efficiency level. For example, developers of the Ivanpah solar farm in California’s Mojave desert had to hire biologists to extract threatened desert tortoises from their burrows, put them on … The project is owned by Google and NRG Energy, and is heavily subsidized by taxpayers. With the annual average of 180 W/m2 in the sun-rays’ heat in that location spread over the 2.5 km2 area of just the heliostat mirrors, the input power is 450 MW. Ocean Power Technologies Inc. developed a power buoy that’s anchored offshore and moves up and down with the waves. David Bergeron But the concept faced challenges. California’s Ivanpah, the world’s biggest power-tower project with a cost of $2.2 billion, has 377 megawatts of capacity. I think the traditional term-of-art is load factor; or at least that’s the term I was taught and my preference for explaining things like this. 2 in Connecticut, operating at 880 MW since 1975, cost 0.5 $/W, making Ivanpah is thus, With about 1000 employees receiving salary and benefits, the annual outlay for that, For comparison again, the Millstone nuclear plant complex employs also about 1000, and its two reactors have been producing 1870 MW actual electrical output. That is the number worked with below. In the end, the national quashed local chapters’ opposition to some solar projects with a 42-page directive—with mixed results. Tom: Grid operators liked the technology, which allowed them to respond to imbalances in less than a second instead of minutes. Today, the growing use of intermittent wind and solar power, which can fluctuate rapidly, has boosted demand for this type of service. The world’s biggest solar-thermal power plant is finally producing enough electricity. Rather than focusing on the poor performance of the Ivanpah, the following text and numbers show how the planned-for performance, capital and operational expenses and earnings compare with another power plant. Dissecting the Failure. All the kinetic energy could be converted into electricity and transferred to the grid as needed. But big coal or natural gas-fired plants could sometimes take several minutes to respond. Robert Michaels Ivanpah was designed and regulated to burn natural gas for one hour a day. Meanwhile, burgeoning demand for clean energy led to a boom in polysilicon production, and prices plunged. The Ivanpah solar plant, in the Mojave Desert, was among the California power plants listed as operating below capacity last week. Will DOE take the Crescent Dunes solar project into bankruptcy? The Ivanpah Solar Electric Generating System in Southern California initially failed to meet contractual obligations, and a yearlong forbearance deal with Pacific Gas & Electric Co. expired Wednesday. The company teamed up with Lockheed Martin Corp. in 2012 to build a large-scale wave energy project in Australia that would have used rows and rows of the buoys. In the end, the national quashed local chapters’ opposition to some solar projects with a 42-page directive—with mixed results. Larger models were provided for commercial rooftops, remote mobile phone towers, and public sites, and the company landed well-publicized deals to help power the Eiffel Tower and Lincoln Financial Field, home to the Philadelphia Eagles football team. Federal and state data show that the plant is increasing its use of natural gas as a supplemental fuel. The predicted Capacity Factor of 31 percent indicates a 120 MW expected actual average output. Solar power is now one of the cheapest sources of electricity, but it wasn’t always this way. It’s cool, but costly. The Ivanpah solar project argues against the former—the top-down, politically driven system of preferential tax credits, subsidies, and mandates. There’s been no shortage of problems at the monstrous Ivanpah Solar Electric Generating System since the plant went online in early 2014. Ivanpah Solar Plant May Be Forced to Shut Down Federally backed project asks California regulators for more time to sort out its problems The Ivanpah plant uses more than … [1] In the summer of 2015 the wholesale price was 2.0 cents per kWh in New England, a region with the highest rate in the US at this time. [Note: It is typical for renewable energy projects to show different units for input, rated output and actual output. The 2200 million dollars … Ivanpah was designed and regulated to burn natural gas for one hour a day. Six innovations that seemed brilliant but didn’t catch on. And producing intermittent electricity causes CO, And there are other items to consider with respect to the net output and CO, The plant also burns gasoline, diesel fuel and, prodigiously, natural gas. The local San Bernardino chapter changed its name and went on opposing the project. Solyndra couldn’t compete with its polysilicon rivals and filed for bankruptcy in 2011, triggering a political firestorm. U.K. Clears Pfizer Covid Vaccine for First Shots Next Week, U.S. Covid Cases Found as Early as December 2019, Says Study, While OPEC+ Fights, Mexico Wins Over $2 Billion With Oil Hedge, Bitcoin’s Rally Spurs Wall Street to Question Future of Gold, Moderna Seeks Clearance for Covid Shot After Strong Results. Concerning the DOE covering the invested billions, it was not just tax- and rate-payers who paid. The U.K. government rejected the £1.3 billion ($1.6 billion) project in 2018, in part because offshore wind could supply the same amount of power for about one-third the cost. One burned up in 1986 and was rebuilt, enlarged, DOE arguing that the plants have to be big to take advantage of economy of scale. […] Jakuba takes a look at the numbers: Central Station Solar: Ivanpah Fail. - Master Resource, http://www.masterresource.org/ivanpah-solar-plant/ivanpah-solar-fail/, US Renewable Statistics: Real vs. Stan, Ed: The 2 power stations are both in the United States, the 377 MW Ivanpah Solar Electric Generating System and the 110 MW Crescent Dunes Solar Energy Project. Ivanpah burns natural gas all night as well. 2 in Connecticut, operating at 880 MW since 1975, cost 0.5 $/W, making Ivanpah is thus 36 times more expensive (inflation excluded). I need a better reason. But the technology has one advantage over solar panels: Developers can add vats of molten salt that retain heat for hours, enabling the towers to produce electricity after sundown. Wind turbines convert kinetic energy—the motion of the blades—into electricity. The Ivanpah Solar Electric Generating System in Southern California initially failed to meet contractual obligations, and a yearlong forbearance deal with Pacific Gas & Electric Co. expired Wednesday. ... a stunning failure … As actual electricity production of these plants is available from the United States Energy Information Administration [3], we may certainly check if the numbers by NREL are right. and provide profit. Several were built over the decades and none performed adequately. That’s one reason the towers have the potential to provide electricity in remote areas, where it’s expensive. I am missing your point. The renamed Beacon Power LLC opened a second facility in 2014. Not a blade of grass was left during construction, and the continues use of herbicides makes the obliteration of life permanent. Have a confidential tip for our reporters? Here’s a marketing slogan for dealing with the bird supply problem: “tastes like chicken.”. The gas in your car’s tank doesn’t need to come from crude oil—you can grow it on a farm. Charles Battig Ivanpah created 1,000 construction jobs and is expected to support 61 permanent jobs. Google, among others, invested millions from its “green” fund, the same Google that, Renewable Energy Sources: Does Their Output Matter?